I’m just too ADHD for Malcolm Gladwell’s renowned 10,000 hour rule of mastering something … ANYTHING.
Sure, it worked for the Beatles and for Bill Gates and countless prominent others – but like American Senator Lloyd Bentsen said to Dan Quayle during the 1988 vice-presidential debate:
I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy“.
And I am no Paul McCartney or Steve Jobs or Margaret Mead.
These are all extraordinary people who bled buckets of blood and sweat over years and years to pursue and perfect just one special thing.
Songwriting. The Personal Computer. Anthropology.
They focused their entire beings on their passion with unbounded dedication. It’s bloody admirable and I celebrate their accomplishments. It’s like they won gold medals in the Life Olympics.
But for this Man on the Fringe, anything I do for more than an hour or two at a time becomes a burden … yes, a job. Even my laboratory job that I enjoy becomes a job after 4 hours at my desk, so I’m packing it in in two weeks and indulging my ADHD side.
I accept and sometimes even celebrate that I’ll never be a master of anything. Huh, you say? Why?
I know Mr. Miyagi would be disappointed in me… wax on, wax off… oh, go catch flies with chopsticks Mr. Miyagi!
I’m resolving to be a mini-master using the 1,000 hour rule.
Yup. 1,000 hours.
One thousand hours is no small feat.
Concentrated effort that is expended for that time frame will take you or me to a level well above the norm – whether its playing violin, sinking golf putts, or painting landscapes. It just won’t make us Anne Sophie Mutter, or Tiger Woods, or Salvador Dali.
Let’s put 1,000 hours into context ’cause it’s pretty meaningless when I just put it out there as a number.
A personal example: I’ve been writing this blog once each week (more or less) for a little more than 2 years now.
On average, I guesstimate that I spend 5-6 hours perched wiggling and squirming in front of my keyboard for each post. It’s not easy to avoid the lure of porn for such long periods. Modern man wasn’t made this way …
Putting all of my grade-school math skills into play tells me that 52 weeks x 2 years x an average of 5.5 hours… equals…
572 hours
This means it’s going to take me about 182 weeks of writing these posts to reach 1,000 hrs of writing. That’s three and a half years of consistent week-in week-out blog writing at a pace of 5 and a half hours a week.
That’s a time frame I can live with. I hope – and feel confident – that my writing skills will continually improve at this pace AND it lets me do a bunch of other things I love to do all at the same time.
Take those same numbers and plug them into whatever your great interest or passion is: piano, knitting, dumpster diving, baton twirling, soap making, archery, Russian lessons, disco dancing … the list is endless but the point remains the same.
You can become really good at a number of things in just a few years with some reasonable focus and effort.
No SuperHuman skills necessary.
If I was trying to achieve the 10,000 hour level of accomplishment, I would need to multiply my daily efforts by 2 to 10 times in order to meet the MASTER level within 4-25 years.
This is why I could never be a great entrepreneur. The passion and focus needed is not a part of my internal makeup … it just isn’t.
There’s something beautiful about doing something for the first time.
If I tried to dedicate 10,000 hours to merely one area of interest, I’d be sailing away at the end of my years with many fewer life firsts – and there are so many first adventures I don’t want to miss.
So … Paul, John, George and Ringo’s troubles are all far away with their “Yesterday”‘s fame. Bill Gates can feel relaxed sitting by his fireplace knowing I will never replace his “Windows”.
Dear Mr. Gladwell:
I’m only 1/10th the person that you write about in your excellent book (Outliers) but I’m content knowing that I can live a great life without being GREAT.
There will be no gold medal for this guy but I’ll stand on the podium all the same – silver medallion swinging in the breeze from my neck – with a smile just as big as if I was the winner.
That is, if I can fit the medal presentation in between German language class and creating a fantastic Chicken Kiev a la Julia Child .
Sincerely,
Man On The Fringe
Jul 20, 2014 @ 08:39:02
You have a heart of GOLD Larry, and JOY in the journey! Now there’s a winning combination!
Jul 21, 2014 @ 10:27:39
Oh Marsha… I’ve got you Sooooo fooled!! But thank you so much… missing my favourite Lady O’ Stretch and Asanas 😉
Jul 20, 2014 @ 10:19:13
Good blog Sir Lawrence of Summerland. ……..what struck me is that people base their “greatness” or their talent on others accomplishments when in fact maybe their greatness could be based on their own achievement……..probably goes againt Gladwell’s grain BUT it certainly keeps one from being frustrated as we can never be as good as the original we try to imitate……..examples Quayle/Kennedy as you so astutely demonstrated………here are a couple more: Steve Martin is no Peter Sellers!!!!!! Arnel Pineda is no Steve Perry…….etc
Now……..me……..I am an excellent mandoliner IN MY OWN WARPED MIND & because of this I have offered my mando talent in publuc venues because I’ve conquered my fear of looking like a jackass in font of large audiences & that one strength motivates me to keep playing (also my love of the instrument).
🙂
Peace,
Jim
Jul 21, 2014 @ 10:30:05
Thanks for your excellent examples James… especially you and YOUR MANDO greatness. It’s like running races… I really only compare against my own previous times, not the winners’ crazy fast ones. Keep on pickin’ good man…
Jan 04, 2015 @ 06:08:16